-
Website
http://www.danhocking.com/ -
Original page
http://www.danhocking.com/2009/06/adding-registration-fees-to-reduce-no-shows-does-this-make-sense/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
faraimpresii
1 comment · 2 points
-
facebook-1620315015
1 comment · 1 points
-
Jon Gauthier
1 comment · 1 points
-
Justin Kozuch
3 comments · 1 points
-
jonlim
1 comment · 1 points
-
-
Popular Threads
What we have been thinking about implementing is a refundable fee of $5. If people show up, they will be given their $5 back. If not, we can donate the fee to a charity of a Kiva member who may need it.
In keeping with our trend of free events, I'd rather not keep the money (we have other monetization models in play), and instead donate it.
I think opening up the events to a bigger, more diverse crowd is far more beneficial to us. Of course, with that comes the problem of sourcing a larger venue. It would be very difficult to put a positive PR spin on using the money to fund a larger venue when we have those other monetization models in play.
So for students I hope all events keep it free, at 3+ events a month, at $10 a pop potentially, then it just becomes unfeasible for students to participate.
Should those with the ability to pay contribute? If there's more meaning to the money maybe. The idea of the money being donated then not only helps with the issue of no-shows, but it itself becomes a cultural ceremony of that community.
(not pointing any fingers here) Are these sorts of fees a solution for a management problem? No. So as long as the fees are implemented as such (and not like a group effort for instance), then they'll get this sort of kickback.
In a way, introducing a fee places a significant burden on the event organizers. As soon as anything more than a quarter leaves my pocket as a registration fee, my expectations are significantly raised. If you're going to charge even a nominal fee, I'm fully expecting that each event you throw is going to have a takeaway for me - otherwise, I'll gravitate towards the multitude of free events offered to our community.
As soon as you give money to attend at event like that, it transforms, and you're basically paying to be sold to.
Justin, I think your idea works, but I'm not especially keen on refundability being mixed with charity. If a different charity was selected each month and a minimum $5 donation was required to register, I think that's the sweet spot. You would have to make it clear from the outset that it's a donation directly to a cause and not being paid to the event organizers, but that would be a way to do some good and reduce the no-shows by having people committed to showing up. A fee waiver option for current students in order to encourage them to get involved and participate (which far too few of us do) would need to be figured out in addition to this, but could work quite effectively.
On a more positive note, I really like the idea of a fee waiver option for current students, as we are trying to target youth (ie, college/university students). Again, this introduces a new issue: checking for student ID's. We'd need a volunteer to help manage registration, but I feel that's something we can source quite easily.
I've got a few blog posts to write today, so I think I will dedicate a blog post to this very topic. Thank you for your insight, it's been incredibly valuable. I will see if I can come up with a plan to implement this for future events (and of course, we'll give you props!).